Men and women are playing different games when they go online to date. This guide will give you actionable, research-backed advice to make real progress toward finding someone you can connect with long term.
Here’s what we’re going to do, in order:
- Shift your mindset so you stop optimizing for the wrong outcome
- Give you real insight into the person on the other side of the screen — what they’re seeing, what they’re filtering for, what they’re praying for
- Hand you specific, doable things that put you in the best position to show your best self and put the odds in your favor
This guide is the companion to the Enneagram Dating Guide for Men and the Enneagram Dating Guide for Women. Those go deep on personality patterns. This one is about everything that happens through a screen — and the first five minutes after you finally meet in person.
It also borrows from Vanessa Van Edwards’s research-backed book Captivate, which is one of the sharpest non-dating books about how humans actually decide they like each other. We’ll use her best ideas — the Triple Threat, Conversation Sparks, and the Franklin Effect — and apply them directly to a Hinge profile.
One ground rule: This guide is meant to be read by both men and women. The “for men” sections include what women are actually thinking. The “for women” sections include what men are actually doing. The hope is that you finish reading with more empathy for the other side of the app — and a much better profile.
The Two Realities
| The Men’s App | The Women’s App |
|---|---|
| 1–3% match rate on average | 30–50% match rate on average |
| Inbox is mostly silence | Inbox is mostly noise |
| Photos decide ~80% of the verdict in 2 seconds | Bio + photos must screen for both safety and substance |
| Failure mode: invisibility | Failure mode: overwhelm |
| Mistake: think “more swipes” fixes it | Mistake: think “more filters” fixes it |
| Real goal: become someone worth a second look | Real goal: filter for a specific person, not a generic one |
Notice the asymmetry. A man’s problem on the app is being seen at all. A woman’s problem is sorting through what’s already in front of her. Different problems require different solutions. Generic dating advice fails because it pretends those two columns are the same.
If you remember nothing else, remember this: when men ask “how do I get more matches,” they’re usually asking the wrong question. When women ask “where are all the good ones,” they’re usually looking past them.
The Mindset Shift: You Are Not Solving the Same Problem
Once you accept that your inbox and theirs look nothing alike, the strategy starts to write itself. The first move is to stop solving your problem and start solving theirs.
If you’re a man, your job is to make a woman who is exhausted by 200 lookalike profiles feel like she just found a real person. Your job is not to be the most attractive man on the app. It’s to be the most legible. You are competing for two seconds of her attention against a sea of guys who all blur together. Specificity is your superpower. Generic is your enemy.
If you’re a woman, your job is to make it dead simple for the right guy to find you and easy for the wrong guy to keep scrolling. Your job is not to attract more attention. It’s to attract the right attention and repel the rest. The math is on your side — you don’t need volume. You need precision.
Both jobs require the same internal move: think about the other person’s environment first, your own second. The man should write his profile imagining the woman who has already swiped left 50 times today. The woman should write her profile imagining the man who has matched with no one this week and is one disappointment away from deleting the app.
That’s the mindset shift in one sentence: stop performing for the algorithm, start designing for the person on the other end of it.
Once you do that, every other tactic in this guide makes sense.
Your Photos: The 2-Second Verdict
For Men: What She’s Actually Doing in 2 Seconds
She opens your profile. Her eyes hit photo one. About two seconds later she has decided whether you exist.
If photo one is a “no,” she swipes left and you were never a person to her. If photo one is a “maybe,” she scrolls. She is scanning, in this order: face → body → lifestyle → social proof → vibe. The bio comes last, and only if the photos earned it.
Your one job: give her enough information that she can imagine saying yes in person.
The five photos you actually need:
A clear, well-lit, smiling face shot. Just your face. Eyes visible. No sunglasses. No filter that makes you look 19. What she’s thinking: “Could I introduce this person to my best friend without having to explain anything first?”
A full-body photo. Don’t hide. What she’s thinking: “Is he being honest? Because I am absolutely going to find out in person.”
You doing something you actually love. Cooking, climbing, playing guitar, holding a paintbrush, fixing a thing, walking your dog. NOT a sunset selfie at Joshua Tree where you’re trying to look “contemplative.” What she’s thinking: “Does he have a life he’s bringing into mine, or am I going to have to be the entire activities department?”
One photo with other people. Friends, family, a dog, a kid you’re related to. Anyone willing to co-sign that you are a normal human capable of being loved. What she’s thinking: “Do other people like him? Because if no one likes him, that’s information.”
A real smile. Not a smirk. Not a “candid” that you obviously set up with a tripod and prayed about. What she’s thinking: “Does he know how to be happy?”
That’s it. Five photos. Most men post six versions of the same one and call it a profile.
Things She Will Dock You For, Instantly, No Appeal
- Sunglasses in every photo. She can’t see your eyes. She is not getting in a car with someone whose eyes she has never seen.
- The group photo with four other men in matching sunglasses. She doesn’t know which one you are. She is not going to do detective work to find out. This is now a test she failed you on.
- The shirtless gym mirror selfie. Nobody wins with this one. Not even the guys who actually look great. Especially them.
- The car photo. She is not impressed by your car. She is quietly wondering whether the car is the most interesting thing about you.
- The cropped-out woman. Yes, we can tell. The disembodied hand on your shoulder is louder than you think.
- The sedated tiger / lion / drugged elephant. Please. No. We have all seen the documentary.
- A bio that says “swipe left if you’re crazy.” She already did. She could hear the bitterness from across the parking lot.
(The fish pic and the giant truck pic have their own warning. Pour yourself a drink and read the next section.)
The Captivate Connection: The Triple Threat
Vanessa Van Edwards calls the three nonverbal cues that build instant trust the Triple Threat: warmth, competence, and trustworthiness. Your photo lineup should hit all three.
- Face shot = warmth.
- You doing something = competence.
- You with other people = trustworthiness.
Three photos. Three signals. Most men post the same photo six times and wonder why nothing’s working.
For Women: Photos Are Openings, Not Filters
Yes, men’s eyes are doing something wildly less analytical than women’s. Most are deciding within the first two photos and then maybe — maybe — checking if you wrote anything interesting. That’s the bad news.
Here’s the worse news: the good guys and the bad guys are doing the exact same thing. They’re both swiping right on nearly anything with a pulse. Why? Because most men aren’t getting matches. Period. Unless he’s driving a Tesla, looksmaxxed into a Greek statue, or has a clavicle structure that ended a war, the average guy is getting close to zero interaction from women on the apps. He has learned the only winning move is to swipe right on everything and let the inbox sort it out later.
This means photos alone can’t filter for you. The lazy guys will match. The good guys will match. At the photo stage they look identical. (Don’t panic — your bio is going to do the filtering work, and we’ll get there in the next section.)
But your photos can still do something powerful. They can be strategic openings that invite the right guy to picture his life next to yours.
Here’s how to think about it.
The face shot is non-negotiable. Not because you owe him one, but because he needs to know what you actually look like. No filter that erases your features. Just you.
The body shot is optional. If your inbox is already overflowing, opt out — you don’t owe a body shot up front. If you’re trying to widen the funnel, include one. Either choice is a strategy. Neither is required.
Now the move almost nobody talks about: pick photos of yourself doing the things you want your future partner to do with you.
Men are looking for openings. Give them the right ones.
- Want a guy who plays soccer? Show a photo of you playing soccer.
- Want a guy with a real job? Show a photo of you at yours.
- Want a guy who’ll take you out on the town for a real night? Show a photo of you out, dressed up, in your element.
- Want a guy who hikes? Show a photo of you on the trail — not at the summit looking moody, on the trail, mid-step, sweaty.
- Want a guy with good friends? Show a photo of you with your good friends. (Be careful though)
You are not just showing him you. You are showing him the version of his life he gets to have if he’s standing next to you. That’s the picture he’s actually responding to.
And the last move: leave a little to the imagination. Five photos is more than enough. You don’t need every angle, every outfit, every era of your life. Mystery is leverage. Use it. ;)
For Men: Be the Fun
Here’s the secret most dating advice for men buries under fifteen paragraphs of “alpha energy” nonsense: girls just want to have fun.
That’s it. That’s the entire mindset.
The reason nobody tells you this is because “be fun” doesn’t sell a $497 course.
But here’s the part nobody does talk about: fun has prerequisites. You can’t just write “love to laugh” in your bio and expect her to believe it. (Side note: “love to laugh” is one of the saddest things you can write in a bio. Nobody hates to laugh. You haven’t said anything. Move on.) Fun is a structure. You have to build it.
What Fun Actually Requires
Real fun happens when two things are true at the same time:
- She feels safe. Physically. Emotionally. Socially. Safe enough to drop her guard. Safe enough to laugh without scanning the room for exits.
- There’s an element of the unknown. Surprise, novelty, possibility, a little mystery. Without it, “safe” turns into “boring,” which is fun’s other enemy.
Get either one wrong and there is no fun. Too safe = boring (no spark). Too unknown = scary (high alert). Your job as a man on a date is to build the room where both are true at once.
This is also why “want to come back to my apartment on the first date?” almost never works. It’s not because she doesn’t like you. It’s because she has known you for ninety minutes. She doesn’t know if your apartment has windows. She doesn’t know if your roommate is a guy named Brad. She doesn’t know if you have a Funko Pop collection she will need to politely react to. The certainty isn’t there, the safety isn’t there, and so the fun isn’t there. You skipped twelve steps and asked for the prize.
The Four Things That Help (and the Way Each One Backfires)
Some advantages stack the deck. Let’s just be honest about it. But here’s the thing nobody ever mentions: every one of these has a tipping point where it stops helping and starts hurting. And the reason is the same in every case — the moment any of them becomes a substitute for an actual personality, she can smell it from her couch.
Money helps, but it backfires the moment it’s doing the work that you’re supposed to be doing. A guy who leads with his watch attracts people who care about the watch. (This is also why genuinely wealthy people often hide it — they want the experience to be rich because of what it is, not what it cost. Pay attention to that move.) Money is a tool, not a personality. If you don’t have it, don’t sweat it. If you do have it, don’t lean on it.
Being in shape helps, but only up to the point where it still looks like you have a life. A guy who clearly works out a few times a week reads as healthy and disciplined. A guy whose body says “I have not had a conversation that wasn’t about macros since 2019” reads as a loner who lives at the gym because the gym is easier than people. The signal you’re going for is capable, not isolated.
Good friends help, but only if some of your photos also show you on your own. If every single shot is a group shot, you look like you’re hiding inside your friend group. Remember: she is trying to date you, not your buddy in the orange shirt. Be comfortable being a person on your own and a person in a group. Show her both.
Having a passion helps, but only if it’s not your entire identity. One photo of the thing you love is interesting. Six photos of the same thing tells her your weekends, your conversation ceiling, and your whole personality are already booked. Bring her into one room of your life, not the only room.
The real signal in all of this isn’t having the advantage. It’s having it in proportion to a full life. Most men don’t have all four. Almost no one does. Don’t waste your energy comparing yourself to a profile that has all four — that profile is usually performing the four, not living them. Show what’s actually true about you, in proportion. That’s the move.
What Your Profile Actually Needs to Communicate
Your profile is a four-question test, in this order:
- Are you safe? (No red flags. No bitter bio. No “swipe left if you’re crazy.“)
- Are you fun? (Show, don’t tell. A photo of you actually having fun beats a bio that says “love to laugh.” Which we’ve now covered twice. Stop saying it.)
- Are you a good person? (Bonus. Visible warmth — with friends, with a dog, with a kid, with a stranger.)
- Have you accomplished something real? (Bonus. Not required. But it lands when it’s real.)
Notice what’s not on the list: “are you hot?” She got that answer in photo one. Don’t burn the other five photos on variations of the same answer.
A Quick PSA About the Fish Pic
Catching a big fish is not an accomplishment. To her, all fish look like the same fish.
The one exception: if you live in Florida and you’ve genuinely caught a fish bigger than her dad’s biggest fish, post the fish. Florida women know fish. The fish might land.
But — and her group chat is going to notice this — the fish pic and the giant truck pic live on the same psychological frequency. Both are quietly saying “please notice the size of this thing I am holding / standing next to.” Women have a name for what that signals. You can probably guess it.
Be careful with the fish pic. Be careful with the truck pic. Neither one is doing the work you think it’s doing.
Your Bio: A Handful of Hooks, Not a Resume
For Men: Three Lines, Three Hooks
Three short lines. She is not reading a paragraph. She has an inbox to get through, a job, friends, a life. Respect her time and she’ll respect yours.
There are two ways to fail before you even start.
Failure 1: Generic Man.
“Just a normal guy who loves coffee, dogs, and adventure.”
Cool. That’s literally every man on the planet. You haven’t told her anything. You’ve taken up space.
Failure 2: The List of Demands.
“6’2”, entrepreneur, fluent in three languages. Swipe left if you can’t keep up.”
Now she knows you’re exhausting. Now she’s gone. Bonus negative points if you also added “no drama” — every man who has ever written that has been the drama.
The version that actually works:
“Recovering perfectionist. Will fight you about whether Casablanca holds up. Currently learning to make actual ramen and failing in interesting ways.”
Three lines. Three hooks. What does “recovering perfectionist” mean? Does Casablanca hold up? How’s the ramen disaster going?
Vanessa Van Edwards calls these Conversation Sparks — prompts that pull a response with almost no effort. Your entire profile should be Conversation Sparks. Make it impossible for her to write “Hey :)” because you’ve left specific, weird, real things to grab onto.
The trick is specific + slightly self-deprecating + revealing one real thing. Specific because generic is invisible. Self-deprecating because nobody trusts a man who can’t laugh at himself. One real thing because she needs to feel like she’s about to talk to a person, not a wall of accomplishments.
A few more directions that work:
- “Eleven weeks into making sourdough that doesn’t taste like punishment. Slowly winning.”
- “My one personality trait is losing at chess to my niece, every time, on purpose.”
- “I make strangers laugh on planes. It’s a skill set with no other use case.”
- “Ask me about the time I tried to fix my own dishwasher. There is a YouTube comment section that knows me by name.”
Notice what’s missing from all of these: a job title, a height, a list of things you “love.” Save those for the conversation. The bio is the trailer, not the movie.
For Women: Build a Filter, Not a Wishlist
Most women’s bios are written like a job posting. Looking for: 6’+, fit, employed, no smokers, must love dogs, no drama. Don’t bother. None of those filters actually filter.
Here’s why the physical filter fails: men will swipe right anyway. The guys who don’t meet your height, fitness, or income bar will absolutely DM you to “prove” they’re the exception. The guys who do meet it will assume you’re shallow and either disappear or arrive expecting to be rewarded for their CV. Either way, you’ve spent your bio attracting the exact attention you don’t want.
You have to flip the move entirely. Your bio should be a creative or intellectual filter — something a man has to think about for ten seconds before he can even respond. Make him show you something. Make him do a small piece of real work before he gets your attention.
The structure:
Name a real, specific interest you have. Then ask him to bring you something specific in return.
Examples that actually filter:
- “I’m trying to read every Kazuo Ishiguro novel this year. Tell me which one you’d defend the hardest, and why.”
- “I make pottery on weekends. Tell me about the last thing you made with your hands — anything counts. Bonus points if it failed.”
- “Currently obsessed with the history of pre-Columbian textiles. If you know literally anything about this, please bother me.”
- “I want to learn one new card game a month. Pitch me yours and explain the move that wins it.”
- “Looking for someone to argue with about whether Kendrick or Cole is the better lyricist. Pick a side and bring receipts.”
Notice what these all have in common:
- They reveal something specific and real about you — a hook for the right guy to recognize himself in.
- They require effort to answer well. A lazy “haha cool” doesn’t pass.
- They are impossible to fake. He either knows about Ishiguro or he doesn’t.
- They flip the power dynamic. You’re not auditioning to be picked. You’re the one running the audition.
- They don’t reject men by what they look like. They reject men by whether they can be interesting to you for more than a sentence. That is a much better signal.
A guy who reads your bio and writes “haha I love books too” has self-selected out. He told you everything you needed to know. A guy who responds with an actual Ishiguro take — even a wrong one — has done the work, which is the only thing you actually wanted to know in the first place.
This is also where Vanessa Van Edwards’s Conversation Sparks idea hits its highest gear. You’re not just sparking a conversation — you’re sparking it on your terms, in a topic where you’re the one who decides whether his answer is interesting. You’ve moved from being filtered to being the filter.
One more thing: pick a topic you genuinely care about. The whole move falls apart if your “filter” is something you put in your bio because it sounded cool. The point is to start the relationship with a real conversation about a real thing you actually love. The men who can meet you there are the ones worth meeting at all.
The Opening Message: Why “Hey” Is Killing You
For Men
“Hey” is invisible. You wrote nothing. She has 47 of those.
Captivate’s Conversation Sparks idea is the cure: trigger a feeling or a specific memory, not a fact.
Bad: “How was your weekend?” (Boring, generic, requires effort.)
Better: “OK the photo with the giant succulent — is that thing real, and how have you not killed it yet?”
The best first messages are:
- Specific to something in her profile.
- Easy to answer in one or two sentences.
- An invitation for her to be the expert about her own life.
That last one matters more than people realize. People love being asked about themselves by someone who actually paid attention.
For Women on Bumble (When You Open)
The “Hi how’s it going” you send to him is also invisible. He will match with anyone, but he’ll respond to whoever wrote something interesting.
Same logic: pick something specific from his profile and ask a real question. If you’ve ever wondered why your matches go cold after one exchange, this is usually why. You’re testing the waters when you should be opening a door.
For Women on Hinge or Tinder: The Driver’s Seat Response
Different problem, same solution. On the apps where men open the conversation, your inbox is a problem. Most of those messages are some flavor of “Hey :)” or “How was your weekend?” and you have rightly stopped responding.
Here’s the move: don’t ignore the formula messages. Filter them.
You already have a filter in your bio. Now build a second one — a standard, slightly clever response that you reuse on every “Hey :)” you get. Most guys are running the same lazy opener on 200 women and getting absolutely nothing back. You are about to be the one woman who hits him with something that makes him think for ten seconds. Then you get to see what he’s actually capable of.
The structure:
- Call out the formula gently. Acknowledge that “hey :)” is what 90% of his openers are getting back from everyone.
- Give him one specific thing to react to from your profile. Force him to prove he actually looked at it.
- Leave him a real opening to be funny, weird, or honest.
The kind of reply that does all three at once:
“OK how many times have you used that opener and what’s the best response you’ve ever gotten from it? Also — bonus points if you noticed which coffee place I’m in for my second pic.”
Look at what one message just did:
- It made him laugh (or it didn’t, and you’ve already learned everything you need to know).
- It gave him a specific test he can pass or fail.
- It rewarded effort. A good guy will tell you a real story about his worst opener and then nail the coffee shop. A lazy guy will write “lol idk” and keep scrolling.
- It changed the power balance entirely. He came in with formula. You hit back with intention. Now he has to actually show up.
Here’s the part nobody says out loud: the good guys are exhausted too. They’re using the same lazy opener as the bad guys because they have stopped getting responses from anyone, and they have run out of energy. They’re not lazy. They’re depleted.
A good guy who gets a real, specific, slightly playful reply from you is going to feel like he just won the lottery. He is going to bring it on the next message because you gave him an opportunity to. That’s the move you have that he doesn’t. He can’t make you respond. You can give him a chance to deserve it.
You are not begging him to be interesting. You are giving him permission to be. And the men who can take that permission and run with it are the only ones worth meeting in the first place.
Both sides: the goal of any first message is not to be impressive. The goal is to make replying easy — and to give the other person the smallest possible doorway into being the better version of themselves.
From Match to Date: The Texting Trap
Both genders make this mistake in opposite ways.
Men text-marathon for two weeks, never propose meeting, then the energy dies and she ghosts. Or worse: send 14 messages a day. This is not connection. This is anxiety in disguise.
Women drag out the texting because it feels safer. The man gets bored or frustrated and disappears. Then you wonder where the good ones go.
The rule: meet in person within 5–7 days of matching. Texting is not a relationship. It’s a hallway. Get to the room.
How Each Enneagram Type Sabotages the Texting Stage
- Type 1: Edits every message three times. Comes across as stiff.
- Type 2: Over-invests by message four. He hasn’t even agreed to meet you yet.
- Type 3: Texts in brand voice. Where’s the person?
- Type 4: Sends a vulnerable monologue at 11pm. The match wasn’t ready.
- Type 5: Goes silent for three days, then sends a thoughtful paragraph. Match has moved on.
- Type 6: Re-reads every text for hidden meanings. Asks two friends. Spirals.
- Type 7: Already chatting with three other matches. None of them get a real reply.
- Type 8: Opens with a challenge. “Bet you can’t keep up.” She can. She blocks.
- Type 9: “Haha yeah.” “Haha yeah.” “Haha yeah.” The conversation flatlines by message four.
(For the full pattern of how your type shows up in dating, see the men’s guide and the women’s guide.)
The First In-Person Meet: Triple Threat in Action
This is where Captivate earns its keep. The first five minutes of an in-person date determine almost everything that comes after.
Warmth. Arrive on time or five minutes early. Smile when you see them — a real one, eyes included. Open posture. Visible hands. Don’t have your phone in your hand when they walk up. (Captivate is unusually firm on this: hidden hands kill trust.)
Competence. You picked the venue. It has good lighting, low background noise, and an easy exit if it bombs. You don’t need to impress. You need to make her feel safe and seen. Coffee shops, walking dates, neighborhood bars in well-lit areas. Men reading this, hear me: she does not need a Michelin star. She needs to know she can leave if she wants to.
Trust. Be the person from the profile. If your photos showed a guy who hikes, don’t reveal at minute 12 that you actually hate the outdoors. Internal consistency is the entire game.
For women: notice these same three things in him. Did he arrive on time? Are his hands visible? Does he look like the photos? Does he ask follow-up questions or just wait for his turn to talk? You’re collecting Triple Threat data the same way he is.
The Franklin Effect: A Captivate Move That Actually Works
One of the most counterintuitive findings in social psychology is the Franklin Effect: asking someone for a small favor makes them like you more, not less. Benjamin Franklin used it to turn a political enemy into a friend by asking to borrow a rare book.
What this means for online dating:
- On the first date, ask their advice on something real. “I’m trying to learn to cook one thing well — what should I start with?”
- Let them be the expert for a moment.
- Listen like it matters. Thank them. Maybe even text them about it later.
This is the opposite of how most people approach dating, which is to perform competence at all times.
For men: this is your secret weapon. Vulnerability beats performance. Asking for advice signals confidence — only insecure people refuse to need anything.
For women: this is permission to stop being self-sufficient on a first date. You don’t have to prove you don’t need him. Letting someone help you with something small is intimacy, not weakness.
New Solutions Nobody’s Talking About
Some of these are mine. Take what’s useful.
The Opposite-Sex Profile Audit
Show your profile to one trusted friend of the opposite sex. Not your best friend. Not your sibling. A friend who’ll be honest. Ask them three questions:
- What’s the first thing you notice?
- What’s confusing?
- What would make you swipe left?
You will be horrified. You will also fix more problems in 10 minutes than you’d fix in 10 weeks of swiping.
The “One Photo, One Vibe” Rule
Each photo should communicate one specific thing about you. Not “general handsome” or “general fun.” One thing. If you can’t describe what each photo says about you in five words, replace it.
The Quarterly App Detox
Delete the apps for two weeks every quarter. Not forever. Two weeks. The reset is real. The apps reward compulsion, and compulsion ruins your taste.
The Tuesday Test
Before agreeing to a second date, ask yourself: would I want to see this person on a Tuesday in February when nothing exciting is happening? If your honest answer is no, the chemistry you felt on Saturday night was sparkly, not real.
The Three-Second Bio Rule (For Women)
Before you swipe left on a man because his photos are mediocre, give him three seconds on the bio. Many genuinely good men have terrible photo instincts. Many terrible men have great photographers. The bio is more honest than the photos almost every time.
The “Show, Don’t Filter” Rule (For Men)
Stop trying to optimize for matches. Optimize for the right matches. A profile that gets 30 swipes from compatible women is infinitely better than one that gets 300 from women who’ll ghost after one date. Volume is a vanity metric. Compatibility is a real one.
The Bottom Line
Online dating isn’t broken. It is, however, brutally efficient at exposing inauthenticity. Performance gets punished. Specificity gets rewarded.
The men who do well aren’t the most attractive — they are the most legible. The women who do well aren’t the most attractive — they are the most specific about what they actually want.
If you take three things from this guide:
Different problems, different solutions. Men need to be seen. Women need to filter. Stop applying men’s advice to women, and stop applying women’s advice to men.
Triple Threat your profile. Warmth, competence, trust — every photo should hit one. Every line of your bio should hit one. Captivate is right about this.
Get off the app fast. Texting is not dating. The goal of the message is to get the meeting. The goal of the meeting is to find out if the message was lying.
And one bonus, because I think it’s the truest thing in this whole guide:
The people you actually want to date are also tired and confused. They are not playing it cool. They are not gaming the system. They are mostly hoping someone will see them clearly and not flinch.
Be the person who doesn’t flinch.
Want to go deeper? Read the Enneagram Dating Guide for Men and the Enneagram Dating Guide for Women for type-by-type breakdowns of how your personality shapes everything you do on a date — long before you ever opened an app.
