Why is Pete Davidson considered an Enneagram Type 9?

Despite his chaotic public image, Pete Davidson shows classic Type 9 traits: conflict avoidance through self-deprecating humor, suppressed anger that occasionally erupts, a tendency to merge with his partners' identities in relationships, and a constant search for inner peace despite mental health struggles. His laid-back demeanor masks the inner turmoil typical of Nines.

What are some examples of Pete Davidson's Type 9 traits?

Pete's Type 9 characteristics are evident in his self-deprecating comedy style (diffusing tension before it arises), his relationship patterns (adopting partners' styles and interests), his struggles with expressing anger directly, and his open battle with mental health issues (reflecting a Nine's desperate search for inner peace). His casual, adaptable demeanor that resonates with audiences is quintessentially Type 9.

What is Pete Davidson's personality like?

Pete Davidson's personality combines laid-back charm with underlying vulnerability. He's known for his self-deprecating humor, emotional transparency about mental health struggles, and an adaptable nature that allows him to fit into diverse social circles. While appearing casual and sometimes disengaged, he demonstrates surprising emotional depth and resilience in handling public scrutiny and personal challenges.

What Enneagram type is Pete Davidson?

Based on public behavior and interviews, Pete Davidson appears to be an Enneagram Type 9 (The Peacemaker). This is evidenced by his conflict-avoidant tendencies, self-deprecating humor, difficulty expressing anger directly, tendency to merge with romantic partners, and constant search for inner peace despite outer turbulence. His laid-back demeanor masks the typical inner struggle of Type 9s to maintain emotional equilibrium.

Pete Davidson Enneagram Type 9: Why Comedy's Bad Boy Is Actually a Peacemaker

DJ Wayne (Updated: 3/9/2025)

Pete Davidson

Pete Davidson Enneagram Type 9: Why Comedy's Bad Boy Is Actually a Peacemaker

What would you add?

Further Analysis