What Women Actually Select For: Strength, Discipline, and the Masculinity No One Teaches

In Part 1, we mapped how shame, rejection, and misdirected anger push young men toward the blackpill. Now we need to talk about what they're actually getting wrong—and what they're getting partially right.

Because here’s the thing nobody on either side wants to admit: incels aren’t delusional about everything. They’ve identified real patterns. They’re just reading them at the shallowest possible level.

And the mainstream advice telling them “just be yourself” and “looks don’t matter” is gaslighting them. Looks matter. Of course they matter. The question is why they matter—and what they’re actually a proxy for.

The Biology They’re Half-Right About

For most of human history, the division was stark. Men hunted, defended territory, built shelter. They took physical risks that women—often pregnant, nursing, or caring for children—couldn’t afford to take. The men who survived and thrived demonstrated something: capable under pressure.

Women who selected for signs of that capability had offspring more likely to survive. This isn’t ideology—it’s evolutionary biology. The preference for strength signals is wired deep.

But here’s where the blackpill analysis stops: at the physical layer. Height. Jaw. Shoulders. Frame. They catalog surface-level traits like they’re reading a spec sheet, then conclude that because they don’t meet the specs, the game is rigged.

They’re looking at the hardware and ignoring the operating system.

What “Strength” Actually Signals

Physical fitness isn’t attractive because muscles are pretty. It’s attractive because of what maintaining your body requires: discipline, consistency, delayed gratification, and the ability to push through discomfort.

A man who can stay consistent in the gym for years is signaling—without saying a word—that he can probably stay consistent in a relationship. In a career. Under financial pressure. When things get boring.

The outward appearance is a proxy for inward discipline. Women aren’t consciously thinking “his biceps indicate follow-through on quarterly goals.” But the pattern-recognition circuitry that evolved over millennia is reading exactly that signal.

This is what the blackpill gets catastrophically wrong: they think women are selecting for the appearance itself. Women are selecting for what the appearance signals about the person underneath.

Which means a man who’s disciplined in other visible ways—how he speaks, how he handles setbacks, how he maintains his space, his commitments, his word—is sending the same signal through a different channel.

The Three Layers of Masculine Strength

Here’s the framework nobody gives young men:

Layer 1: Physical Strength (Surface)

This is where the blackpill lives. And it’s not nothing. Taking care of your body matters—not for the aesthetics, but for what it cultivates internally. The discipline of physical training builds:

  • Distress tolerance (pushing through discomfort)
  • Delayed gratification (results take months, not days)
  • Self-efficacy (proof that effort produces change)
  • Stress regulation (exercise literally metabolizes cortisol)

The blackpill says “if you’re not genetically gifted, this doesn’t matter.” That’s the fatalism talking. A man who transforms his body through discipline is attractive not because of the result—but because of what the process required of him.

Layer 2: Social Strength (Middle)

This is where pickup culture and the red pill live. They’ve correctly identified that social confidence, status signals, and frame control matter in attraction. And they’re not entirely wrong—social skill is a legitimate form of strength.

But here’s where it goes sideways. Pickup culture teaches men to perform strength rather than develop it. Negging. Push-pull. Manufactured scarcity. These are simulations of confidence designed to trigger attraction signals without building the underlying character.

Women notice this. Not always immediately—but eventually. The man running pickup tactics is sending mixed signals: his words say “I’m high-value” but his energy says “I’m performing.” Women describe this as “something felt off” or “he seemed fake.” What they’re detecting is the gap between the signal and the substance.

The red pill is a half-measure. It says “the dating market is harsh, so here’s how to game it.” That’s more useful than the blackpill’s total surrender—but it’s still operating on the wrong level. You can’t game your way into genuine connection. You can only game your way into the appearance of it.

Layer 3: Emotional Strength (Foundation)

This is the level the blackpill can’t see and pickup culture can’t fake.

Emotional strength is:

  • Sitting with your partner’s distress without trying to fix it or flee from it
  • Handling conflict without rage, shutdown, or passive aggression
  • Being vulnerable without collapsing into neediness
  • Holding your ground without dominating
  • Processing rejection without spiraling into shame or revenge fantasies

This is the most counterintuitive part: the ability to feel deeply without being controlled by feelings is the most attractive form of masculine strength.

Women describe this in a hundred different ways: “He makes me feel safe.” “I can be myself around him.” “He’s solid.” “He doesn’t freak out when I’m upset.” What they’re all describing is the same thing: a man with enough internal stability to absorb emotional intensity without destabilizing.

The Alpha/Beta Illusion

The manosphere is obsessed with the alpha/beta dichotomy. Here’s why it’s broken:

The stereotypical “alpha” dominates physically and socially. He controls rooms. Commands attention. Takes what he wants. In the short-term mating context the manosphere obsesses over, this works—dominance signals trigger attraction responses.

But here’s what these communities never talk about: most women aren’t selecting for short-term mating. They’re selecting for partnership. And in partnership, the “alpha” who can’t sit with his wife’s sadness without getting angry, who can’t apologize without feeling emasculated, who treats vulnerability as weakness—that man is emotionally fragile in the exact ways that destroy relationships.

Meanwhile, the man these communities dismiss as “beta”—the one who listens, who can hold space, who doesn’t need to dominate every interaction—is often displaying a kind of strength the “alpha” literally cannot access. Not weakness. A different kind of strength. The strength to remain present when things are hard instead of asserting control.

The real paradigm isn’t alpha vs. beta. It’s:

  • Brittle strength: Looks powerful, breaks under emotional pressure
  • Resilient strength: May not dominate a room, but doesn’t collapse when the room falls apart

Women learn this distinction through experience. The “alpha” who’s exciting at 22 becomes exhausting at 32. The man who can regulate his own emotions and attune to hers becomes more attractive over time, not less.

What This Looks Like Through the Enneagram

Each Enneagram type has a natural expression of strength—and a way it collapses under pressure. The path to genuine masculine strength is different for each type because the obstacle is different.

Type 1: From Rigid Control to Principled Flexibility

Natural strength: Integrity, reliability, moral backbone. Women trust Type 1s because they mean what they say.

Where it collapses: The 1’s need to be “right” turns into criticism—of themselves and their partner. They become rigid, judgmental, impossible to please. The strength becomes a prison.

The growth edge: Learning that imperfection isn’t moral failure. A Type 1 who can laugh at his own mistakes, who can say “I was wrong” without it threatening his identity—that’s a man whose strength has matured from control into wisdom.

Type 2: From People-Pleasing to Genuine Generosity

Natural strength: Emotional attunement, warmth, the ability to make people feel seen.

Where it collapses: The 2 gives to get. His generosity has strings attached—and when the reciprocation doesn’t come, resentment builds. Women feel the transactional energy underneath the nice gestures.

The growth edge: Giving without tracking what’s owed. A Type 2 who helps because he wants to—not because he needs the validation—radiates genuine warmth instead of covert neediness.

Type 3: From Performance to Presence

Natural strength: Drive, competence, the ability to make things happen.

Where it collapses: The 3 performs a version of himself that he thinks is attractive. He leads with achievements, curates his image, and hides anything that doesn’t fit the brand. Women feel like they’re dating a resume.

The growth edge: Being seen for who he is, not what he’s accomplished. A Type 3 who can admit fear, confusion, or failure without spinning it into a growth narrative—that vulnerability is more magnetic than any achievement.

Type 4: From Emotional Intensity to Emotional Depth

Natural strength: Authenticity, depth, the willingness to go to emotional places others avoid.

Where it collapses: The 4 drowns in his own feelings. His emotional intensity becomes self-absorption. Relationships revolve around his inner world, and partners feel like supporting characters in his drama.

The growth edge: Channeling depth outward. A Type 4 who can be present to someone else’s emotional experience—not just his own—transforms intensity into intimacy.

Type 5: From Observation to Engagement

Natural strength: Thoughtfulness, competence, the ability to understand complex situations.

Where it collapses: The 5 retreats into his head. He observes relationships instead of participating in them. His partner feels analyzed, not loved. Emotional intimacy terrifies him because it requires resources he’s afraid of depleting.

The growth edge: Choosing to stay present even when it’s draining. A Type 5 who lets himself need someone—who participates emotionally instead of observing from safety—offers a rare quality: deep understanding combined with genuine presence.

Type 6: From Anxiety to Loyal Courage

Natural strength: Loyalty, reliability, the ability to anticipate problems and protect.

Where it collapses: The 6’s anxiety makes him test his partner’s loyalty constantly. He seeks reassurance, reads between lines that don’t exist, and creates the very instability he fears. Or he goes counterphobic—picking fights to prove he’s not afraid.

The growth edge: Trusting without proof. A Type 6 who can sit with uncertainty—who doesn’t need constant evidence that he’s safe—becomes the rock-solid partner his loyalty always promised.

Type 7: From Escapism to Committed Joy

Natural strength: Energy, optimism, the ability to make life feel like an adventure.

Where it collapses: The 7 avoids pain by chasing novelty. He’s present for the exciting parts and absent for the hard ones. Commitment feels like a cage. His partner gets the fun version but never the full version.

The growth edge: Staying when it stops being fun. A Type 7 who can sit with boredom, sadness, and routine without bolting—who brings his enthusiasm to the mundane—offers something rare: joy without escape hatches.

Type 8: From Domination to Protective Tenderness

Natural strength: Protective instinct, decisiveness, the ability to hold boundaries.

Where it collapses: The 8 confuses control with care. His “protection” becomes domination. Vulnerability feels like exposure, so he armors up—and his partner feels controlled, not cherished.

The growth edge: Tenderness without losing strength. An 8 who can be gentle because he’s powerful—not despite it—offers the rarest combination: a man who can both protect and nurture.

Type 9: From Passivity to Grounded Peace

Natural strength: Calm presence, the ability to make others feel accepted and at ease.

Where it collapses: The 9 disappears. He merges with his partner’s preferences, avoids conflict at all costs, and slowly erases himself from the relationship. His partner feels like she’s dating a mirror, not a person.

The growth edge: Having opinions and expressing them. A Type 9 who can say “actually, I disagree” and “here’s what I want”—who brings himself into the relationship instead of just accommodating—becomes the grounding presence his calm always promised.

Why the Blackpill Can’t See This

The blackpill operates on a single variable: looks. It reduces human attraction to a genetic lottery. And because it’s working with one variable, it reaches the only conclusion that variable allows: if you lost the lottery, it’s over.

But attraction isn’t one variable. It’s a stack:

  1. Physical signals (health, fitness, grooming) → “Is this person capable?”
  2. Social signals (confidence, competence, status) → “Can this person navigate the world?”
  3. Emotional signals (regulation, attunement, vulnerability) → “Can this person handle me?”

The blackpill only sees layer 1. The red pill reaches layer 2. Neither touches layer 3—and layer 3 is where lasting attraction lives.

A man who’s average-looking but emotionally regulated, genuinely confident (not performing), and capable of deep connection will outperform a genetically gifted man who’s emotionally fragile, defensive, and incapable of vulnerability. Not on a dating app first-swipe—but in every interaction that actually matters.

The blackpill’s mistake isn’t seeing that looks matter. It’s concluding that only looks matter. And that conclusion is a choice—a choice to stop the analysis at the most superficial level because going deeper would require doing the terrifying work of internal change.

The Uncomfortable Ask

If you’ve read this far, here’s what it comes down to:

Are you willing to build real strength?

Not gym strength (though that helps). Not social game (though skills matter). The kind of strength that requires you to face the parts of yourself you’ve been avoiding. The shame. The fear of rejection. The anger that doesn’t have a target.

The Enneagram doesn’t just describe your patterns—it shows the specific growth path for your type. The work is different for a Type 4 than a Type 8. The obstacles are different. But the destination is the same: a man who is strong enough to be vulnerable, disciplined enough to be gentle, and grounded enough to stay present when it would be easier to retreat.

That’s what women select for. Not because they read it in a study—because that man is the one who can actually build something lasting with them.

The blackpill says it’s over. The red pill says hack the system. The Enneagram says: know yourself, do the work, become the man who doesn’t need a pill to feel like enough.

Start with finding your type. Then read the dating guide for your type’s specific patterns. Then do the hardest part: start growing.

The algorithm won’t show you this path. You have to choose it.


More Pop Culture Articles

Join 9takes and go deeper with personality

Find out the similarities and differences
between you and anyone